Note that the Firefox alpha version was slower than the stable version.įor more information, see the 2006 benchmark test page.Ĭommentary: This test was one of the first, documented Javascript benchmarks to show the superiority of Opera over the more popular Firefox.
Similarly to the 2006 test, Firefox was considerably slower than Opera, Safari, and Internet Explorer. This is the first test that has shown Firefox’s Javascript engine to be superior to the engines of Opera and Internet Explorer.įor more information, see the 2007 benchmark test page.Ĭommentary: This test was done in response to Apple’s release of Safari for Windows. Even more promising, the Firefox beta was considerably faster than its currently released version (2.0.0.13). I did not include a test with the Firefox beta using extensions because the extensions are not considered compatible with the beta yet.Beta versions of Firefox and Opera were downloaded from nightly builds that were available on Ĭommentary: In contrast to previous tests, Safari championed the fastest Javascript benchmark, overtaking Opera from its throne.
#BROWSER BENCHMARK TEST PLUS#
The extensions I had installed for the test include: Adblock Plus 0.7.5.3, ColorZilla 1.0, Download Statusbar 0.9.6.1, Firebug 1.05, Fission 0.9.5, Foxmarks Bookmark Synchronizer 2.0.45, and Hide Menubar 0310.
#BROWSER BENCHMARK TEST INSTALL#
*Because most Firefox users install extensions, I thought that it was only fair to include a test with my own typical extensions. It’s going to be very interesting to see how the future versions of Google Chrome are able to compete with the more seasoned browsers.įirefox 3.0.pre beta (extensions disabled) Regardless, Safari still holds the crown for the fastest Javascript engine, but almost all other browsers (with the exception of IE8 Beta 2) are very, very close behind - almost so close that it’s not really a practical difference (except for bragging rights). Then again, a lot of Google Chrome’s claim to fame isn’t really geared to a benchmark test like this - it’s more intended for security and live applications that require extensive garbage collection and utilizing non-linear loading of page elements. *Firefox add-ons include Download Statusbar, Fission, Foxmarks Bookmark Synchronizer, Hide Menbar, and Tab Scope.Ĭommentary: I really expected Google Chrome, which was released today, to do much better than it fared in the test results. Perhaps the most surprising is how much worse IE8 fared relative to its competitors - it was 2-3 times slower, but now is performing almost five times slower. Opera, the once champion of the speed test, has fallen from its throne to the second-to-last position. Note that runtimes were equivalent with and without add-ons.Ĭommentary: Safari has taken the lead by performing about twice the speed of its nearest competitors, Chrome and Firefox. *Firefox add-ons include Download Statusbar, X-Marks, and Firebug. All of my tests will be using the Javascript test script, which is available by scrolling down to the bottom of this page. Due to popular demand in the form of a flurry of e-mails, I have decided to continue posting my test results with the newest versions of popular web browsers. The test gained quite a bit of attention, so I created a subsequent test to compare browsers that had been released after the first test (i.e. In 2006, I originally wrote a Javascript speed test that is a derivation of the test that I use today. How does your favorite browser stand up to the competition? Preface I have written a benchmark test, which you can run on your machine at home, to compare the newest versions of Internet Explorer, Opera, Safari, and Firefox. How does your favorite browser’s Javascript engine speed compare to other popular browsers? The speed of your browser’s Javascript is becoming more and more important because of Web 2.0’s reliance on Ajax and complex Javascript libraries.
0 kommentar(er)
